<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NewInfo2Day &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/category/technology/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newinfo2day.com</link>
	<description>New, random information every day!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>For all those Windows 7 fans &#8211; We have RTM</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/windows/for-all-those-windows-7-fans-we-have-rtm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/windows/for-all-those-windows-7-fans-we-have-rtm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scorpus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfo2day.com/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was only yesterday that we said when various people would be getting the final RTM copy of Windows 7. Well today, Microsoft has announced via the Windows Team Blog that Windows 7 has been Released to Manufacturers (RTM) and that the final build is 7600.16385.090713-1255, one build version up from the leaked copy of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://albums.kimag.es/albums/thesdfimages/25883061.png" alt="" width="470" height="171" /></p>
<p>It was <a title="The SDF" href="http://thepcreport.net/2009/07/windows-7-rtm-available-on-august-6/">only yesterday</a> that we said when various people would be getting the final RTM copy of Windows 7. Well today, Microsoft has announced via the <a title="Windows Team Blog" href="http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/windows7/archive/2009/07/22/windows-7-has-been-released-to-manufacturing.aspx">Windows Team Blog</a> that Windows 7 has been Released to Manufacturers (RTM) and that the final build is <strong>7600.16385.090713-1255, </strong>one build version up from the <a title="The SDF" href="http://thepcreport.net/2009/07/windows-7-rtm-could-build-7600-released/">leaked copy of 7600</a> we saw last week.</p>
<p>OEMs should be expecting the RTM copy in around 2 days, with all TechNet and MSDN subscribers having to wait until August 6 to try out the final build of Windows 7. Keep tuned at The SDF to hear their thoughts on the final copy of Windows 7 when they can get it.</p>
<p>(Post taken straight from <a title="The SDF" href="http://thepcreport.net/">The PC Report</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/windows/for-all-those-windows-7-fans-we-have-rtm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Internet Explorer 8 Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryuujin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfo2day.com/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may seem that Microsoft is scared of losing even more market share to Firefox and Chrome. They have resorted to blatant lies; and dirt trowing at the competition. A good product should be able to stand on it&#8217;s own, just like a good politician should talk about his plans, achievements and ideals for making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_594" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-594" title="comparativa-ie8" src="http://www.newinfo2day.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/comparativa-ie8.png" alt="MS Internet Explorer 8 vs Mozilla Firefox vs Google Chrome" width="500" height="418" /><p class="wp-caption-text">According to Microsoft: Internet Explorer 8 vs Mozilla Firefox vs Google Chrome</p></div>
<p>It may seem that Microsoft is scared of losing even more market share to Firefox and Chrome. They have resorted to <strong>blatant lies</strong>; and dirt trowing at the competition. A good product should be able to stand on it&#8217;s own, just like a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2PUZoukfA">good politician</a> should talk about <strong>his</strong> plans, achievements and ideals for making life better instead of spending all his time and effort <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ci2D1ig4df4">attacking and criticizing his competitors</a>.</p>
<p>However it&#8217;s good to know Microsoft has some new ads that talk about the &#8216;awesomeness&#8217; of it&#8217;s web browsing application, look at them and share your thoughts! I&#8217;ll share my favorite MS ad so far first, it&#8217;s about Internet Explorer&#8217;s <em>InPrivate Browsing</em> or as we like to call it <strong>porn mode</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p><br />
<span id="more-593"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>S.H.Y.N.E.S.S. (Sharing Accelerators):</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><p><a href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>F.O.M.S. (Web Slices)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><p><a href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>G.R.I.P.E.S. (Speed improvements)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><p><a href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compare text documents</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/compare-text-documents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/compare-text-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryuujin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfo2day.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a tool for Windows and Linux called Diffuse that allows you to compare multiple text documents in the same window. I took this summary from their site: Diffuse is a graphical tool for merging and comparing text files. Diffuse is able to compare an arbitrary number of files side-by-side and gives users the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_293" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 454px"><img class="size-full wp-image-293" title="diffuse2-thumb" src="http://www.newinfo2day.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/diffuse2-thumb.png" alt="Diffuse running on Windows XP" width="444" height="350" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Diffuse running on Windows XP</p></div>
<p>I found a tool for Windows and Linux called <a href="http://diffuse.sourceforge.net/">Diffuse </a>that allows you to compare multiple text documents in the same window. I took this summary from their site:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Diffuse is a graphical tool for merging and comparing text files. Diffuse is able to compare an arbitrary number of files side-by-side and gives users the ability to manually adjust line-matching and directly edit files. Diffuse can also retrieve revisions of files from Bazaar, CVS, Darcs, Git, Mercurial, Monotone, Subversion, and SVK repositories for comparison and merging.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>You can download it <a href="http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=157784">here </a>by clicking on the &#8220;Download&#8221; link and chosing the appropriate download. If your using Debian/Ubuntu you can simply open the terminal and write: <em><strong> sudo apt-get install diffuse</strong></em> or <em><strong>sudo aptitude install diffuse</strong><span style="font-style: normal;">. There are also some  alternatives (Linux-only) like <a href="http://meld.sourceforge.net/">Meld</a> for <em>Gnome </em>and <a href="http://www.caffeinated.me.uk/kompare/">Kompare </a>for <em>KDE. </em></span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/compare-text-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Outlook 2000 vs 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/microsoft-outlook-2000-vs-2010-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/microsoft-outlook-2000-vs-2010-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryuujin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfo2day.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A picture says a thousend words. Well, this one says three, What the Fuck? It looks like Microsoft Outlook 2010 (torrent/mirror) is going to use the old, non-standared following, HTML render engine that Internet Explorer used and now Word uses! (dont we all love it?) Apparently MS is using this old engine to stay consistant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_226" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-226" title="outlook2000-vs-2010" src="http://www.newinfo2day.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/outlook2000-vs-2010.jpg" alt="Outlook 2000 vs 2010" width="500" height="377" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Outlook 2000 vs 2010</p></div>
<p>A picture says a thousend words. Well, this one says three, <strong><em>What the Fuck?</em></strong></p>
<p>It looks like Microsoft Outlook 2010 (<a href="http://www.demonoid.com/files/details/1924215/8014725/">torrent</a>/<a href="http://torrentz.com/search?q=office+2010">mirror</a>) is going to use the old, non-standared following, HTML render engine that Internet Explorer used and now Word uses! (<a href="http://www.saveie6.com/">dont we all </a><em><a href="http://www.saveie6.com/">love </a></em><a href="http://www.saveie6.com/">it?</a>) Apparently MS is using this old engine to stay consistant and not suffer any performance loss, here a quote from an Outlook Product Manager Dev:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“I am aware of where this decision on our part places Outlook from a standards perspective &#8211; at the same time, we ask that you consider the benefits Outlook users get from having Word tools in their e-mail authoring experience. [...] Having multiple HTML engines could reduce performance, as well as create an inconsistency in terms of what type of content the user is able to create vs. consume.” &#8211; </em><a href="http://www.email-standards.org/blog/entry/microsoft-to-ignore-web-standards/">Source</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure he has a point, they should just <a href="http://www.email-standards.org/clients/">fix their damn engine</a> if they&#8217;re so worried about performance lost and inconsistency. I hope the<a href="http://www.fixoutlook.org/"> campain against this change</a> works, remember it&#8217;s still a beta! If it dosent, I just hope people start using alternatives like <a href="http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/thunderbird/">Thunderbird</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontact">Kontact</a>, <a href="http://www.mutt.org/">Mutt</a>, <a href="http://www.mutt.org/">Evolution </a>or any other mail client whose developers actually care about displaying web pages correctly by following certain standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/microsoft-outlook-2000-vs-2010-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
