<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NewInfo2Day &#187; microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newinfo2day.com</link>
	<description>New, random information every day!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:43:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Internet Explorer 8 Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 09:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryuujin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfo2day.com/?p=593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It may seem that Microsoft is scared of losing even more market share to Firefox and Chrome. They have resorted to blatant lies; and dirt trowing at the competition. A good product should be able to stand on it&#8217;s own, just like a good politician should talk about his plans, achievements and ideals for making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_594" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-594" title="comparativa-ie8" src="http://www.newinfo2day.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/comparativa-ie8.png" alt="MS Internet Explorer 8 vs Mozilla Firefox vs Google Chrome" width="500" height="418" /><p class="wp-caption-text">According to Microsoft: Internet Explorer 8 vs Mozilla Firefox vs Google Chrome</p></div>
<p>It may seem that Microsoft is scared of losing even more market share to Firefox and Chrome. They have resorted to <strong>blatant lies</strong>; and dirt trowing at the competition. A good product should be able to stand on it&#8217;s own, just like a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2PUZoukfA">good politician</a> should talk about <strong>his</strong> plans, achievements and ideals for making life better instead of spending all his time and effort <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ci2D1ig4df4">attacking and criticizing his competitors</a>.</p>
<p>However it&#8217;s good to know Microsoft has some new ads that talk about the &#8216;awesomeness&#8217; of it&#8217;s web browsing application, look at them and share your thoughts! I&#8217;ll share my favorite MS ad so far first, it&#8217;s about Internet Explorer&#8217;s <em>InPrivate Browsing</em> or as we like to call it <strong>porn mode</strong>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p><br />
<span id="more-593"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>S.H.Y.N.E.S.S. (Sharing Accelerators):</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><p><a href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>F.O.M.S. (Web Slices)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><p><a href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>G.R.I.P.E.S. (Speed improvements)</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><p><a href="http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/new-internet-explorer-8-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Outlook 2000 vs 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/microsoft-outlook-2000-vs-2010-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/microsoft-outlook-2000-vs-2010-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryuujin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newinfo2day.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A picture says a thousend words. Well, this one says three, What the Fuck? It looks like Microsoft Outlook 2010 (torrent/mirror) is going to use the old, non-standared following, HTML render engine that Internet Explorer used and now Word uses! (dont we all love it?) Apparently MS is using this old engine to stay consistant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_226" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-226" title="outlook2000-vs-2010" src="http://www.newinfo2day.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/outlook2000-vs-2010.jpg" alt="Outlook 2000 vs 2010" width="500" height="377" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Outlook 2000 vs 2010</p></div>
<p>A picture says a thousend words. Well, this one says three, <strong><em>What the Fuck?</em></strong></p>
<p>It looks like Microsoft Outlook 2010 (<a href="http://www.demonoid.com/files/details/1924215/8014725/">torrent</a>/<a href="http://torrentz.com/search?q=office+2010">mirror</a>) is going to use the old, non-standared following, HTML render engine that Internet Explorer used and now Word uses! (<a href="http://www.saveie6.com/">dont we all </a><em><a href="http://www.saveie6.com/">love </a></em><a href="http://www.saveie6.com/">it?</a>) Apparently MS is using this old engine to stay consistant and not suffer any performance loss, here a quote from an Outlook Product Manager Dev:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>“I am aware of where this decision on our part places Outlook from a standards perspective &#8211; at the same time, we ask that you consider the benefits Outlook users get from having Word tools in their e-mail authoring experience. [...] Having multiple HTML engines could reduce performance, as well as create an inconsistency in terms of what type of content the user is able to create vs. consume.” &#8211; </em><a href="http://www.email-standards.org/blog/entry/microsoft-to-ignore-web-standards/">Source</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure he has a point, they should just <a href="http://www.email-standards.org/clients/">fix their damn engine</a> if they&#8217;re so worried about performance lost and inconsistency. I hope the<a href="http://www.fixoutlook.org/"> campain against this change</a> works, remember it&#8217;s still a beta! If it dosent, I just hope people start using alternatives like <a href="http://www.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/thunderbird/">Thunderbird</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontact">Kontact</a>, <a href="http://www.mutt.org/">Mutt</a>, <a href="http://www.mutt.org/">Evolution </a>or any other mail client whose developers actually care about displaying web pages correctly by following certain standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newinfo2day.com/technology/microsoft-outlook-2000-vs-2010-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
